![]() ![]() ![]() |
A camicia of tela (linen) broidered with 'golden and black silk
Inspiration:
no information however, to confirm the actual actual origin of
the camicia (Prato is in Tuscany). The extant examples differ from the venetian
camicia (Cut my cote) and Sicilian (?) camicia/nightdress (?) in the
Metropolitan Museum in New York. However they are stated as Italian (not
English) and do match the appearance of the camicia in the Bronzino portrait and
others, of the era, showing a larger amount of "flat" neckline.
It is difficult to get visual evidence (in
portraits) of anything but the very end of the gathered cuff ends, so
an assumption has been made here that they could 'possilbly be similar'
Materials: I have used pure linen, Madiera silk embroidery
thread in black, and 'gold'. I am currently using Gutterman linen thread to
sew the seams.
Pattern: The main difference in 'Italian' camicia I have
made before is the lack of gathering at the neck. This is based on the above
extant items. The main difference I can see between these Italian camicia and
English smocks is the apparent lack of sleeve gussets. There are front (and
assumed back also) body gussets. This actually gives more room in the chest area
and so the sleeve gussets do not appear to be needed.
Neckline:Below are all examples, in portraits, of ungathered necklines that are visually similar to the extant example from the Prato museum. 2.![]() 3. 4.![]() 5. 6.![]() 7. ![]() Embroidery Pattern:
Left and right are close ups of the necklines of two of the Prato museum's camicia. It is made of linen and embroidered in silk. The actual embroidery on the extant items is in red
(ish)-brown cross stitch.
I used running (Holbein) stitch for the main
pattern, and edged the camicia neckline in gold thread also. The outer gold line
was of stem stitch.I started to draft out a pattern (and hopefully will finish later) but really wanted to make the camicia in the Bronzino portrait.
Below is an example of the camicia neckline embroidery (on the go) and on the back as well.
![]() ![]() ![]() Sleeves:
![]() ![]() ![]() The embroidery on the sleeves have a 'pared' down pattern in verticle
lines on the sleeves. I based my sleeve embroidery pattern on a simplified
version of the neckline embroidery, using counted embroidery.
Above is the positioning of the embroidery. (left) and the back (middle) and front (right) of the sleeve embroidery. Far Left is a closeup of the cuff from the Bronzino portrait of Eleanora (1542). This shows similar patterning as the emboirdery at the neckline. Left is an example of the embroidery (on the go) which is reversable.
Following are some examples of 'non' straight cuffs from 1540's to 1560's. 1. 2. 3.![]() 4. 5. 6. 7.![]() 1. Florentine School, Portrait of a woman with a dog. (1560- 70), 2. Bronzino Eleonora and her son Francesco (1549), 3. Bronzino, Portrait of Lucrezia Panciatichi (1540), 4. Bronzino Portrait of Eleanora (1542), 5. Bronzino Portrait of Maria di Cosimo (1551) Uffizi, 6. School of Bronzino. Portrait of Lucrezia d Medici (1558) , 7. School of Bronzino Portrait of Isabella d'Medici (1560) Smocking: A new skill learnt... sort of... I had to learn a new skill, as I have not smocked before.. (this can be seen in the Prato extant items). I am using reversable smocking, as the stitches are not visible, from the front, on the extant examples. I embroidered first, then smocked after as it appeared , on the extant items, that the embroidery was 'squished up' as if done in this order. Right is the smocking on the go. I did not have accesss to a pleating machine so did it all by hand. I measured up a grid and used linen thread to pull the pleats into position. The extant items had the verticle sleeve embroidery visible at the top of pleats. Thisrequired a little bit of concentration to make sure that mine were in the same position . ![]() ![]() Right is the pleated cuff on the front and back. With reverse smocking, the stitches are on the back of the work, so none are seen on the front. ![]() ![]() Looking back at the original extant camicia, there was a cuff band sewn onto the end. This was sewn on with what looks like a double running stitch. The pleating ends under the band. The closure is a silk covered button and loop. Middle and Far right are my 'version' of the cuff band and closure. ![]() ![]() Construction:I
have found little published information on actual seam treatments
specifically for 16th century Florence, let alone for camicia.
There are extant items of Sicilian camicia and drawers at the New York Metropolitan Museum. Information supplied by Kathy Page at both a Pensic class and Kalamazoo, 2007 (What Goes on Under a Sicilian Woman’s Dress? The Bare Essentials ( a discussion on the above items) is as follows.
The seams were sewn with linen thread using back stitch to make it stronger. Stitches are about 2mm in size. The flat fell seam was finished with whip stitch. (below, showing the inside of the seam). I will most likely flat fell the seams (to make it
stronger to withstand washing and based on information below which, though not
Tuscan, is 16th century Italian. I have not got other information on the seam
treatment of the extant items above).
![]() ![]() Hem:
![]()
Archeological Sewing by Heather Rose Jones (2001)
http://heatherrosejones.com/archaeologicalsewing/index.html (new adsottana:
8/06)
Archive of Stitches from Extant Textiles. www.bayrose.org
Sewing Stitches Used in Medieval
Clothing: http://www.personal.utulsa.edu/~marc-carlson/cloth/stitches.htm
Before you start to Smock: www.geocities.com?Wellesley/3351/smkstch2.htm?200830 Other:
Page, Kathleen: What Goes on Under a Sicilian Woman’s Dress? The Bare Essentials. presented at 42nd International Congress on Medieval Studies, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, and again at Pensic, 2007. (observations on extant items found at New York Metropolitan Museum ) 30 pages. © K Carlisle. October , 2007 - January, 2008 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
(c). K.Carlisle, 2009.